Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. Richmond Nelson
    20 April 2018 @ 5:42 am

    Perhaps one of the best ways to retain salient and important information is to arrange it in the form of a poem. The mind is able to recall more easily that which is organized in this manner. When poetry is set to music it has twice the power of recall on the mind. During the formative years of a child when the mind is like a sponge, open and flexible, the effect of constant congregational singing lends to excellent recall in later years. When biblical truths are arranged poetically and set to music, such truths will often never be forgotten. It is not surprising therefore to observe the enemies of biblical truths are also the enemies of the hymns.

    • rcottrill
      20 April 2018 @ 7:37 am

      You make an excellent point. Memorization is indeed aided by putting information in a poetic format. God knew that, of course. Psalms, the hymn book of the Bible, is Hebrew poetry. Not quite the same as ours, as it uses a parallelism of thought, rather than of rhythm and rhyme, but poetry nonetheless.

      Your comment about children absorbing truth through regular congregational hymn singing is another great point. I can see it in my own case. Hymns heard nearly seventy years ago are still carried in my balding head.

      The idea that enemies of Bible truth are also enemies of our traditional hymns–I think it’s a bit more complicated than that, but point taken. There’s a growing sloppiness about Bible truth, a superficial treatment, a skimming of some vague ideas off the top that will basically find agreement with anybody and everybody. Often that approach is reflected in contemporary religious music.

      An example: Recently, I had reason to review carefully the rendering of a song called Behold!, by the rock group Whitecross. (You can see and hear it here.) It is supposedly based on John the Baptist’s presentation of Christ as the Lamb of God (Jn. 1:29). But it is so shallow it could be acceptable to just about anybody, Christian or not.

      Three things that struck me. 1) A photograph of the group near the beginning. The sullen foursome of long-haired young men in leather jackets seems calculated to make them seem just like dozens of secular rock groups. But aren’t we supposed to be different? Where is the joy of the Lord in that photograph? 2) The song is delivered with a kind of shriek or scream, backed by an incessant, intrusive beat. What that music style expresses to me is anger and rage, not a love for God’s holy Lamb.

      3) More importantly than anything else, the song never gets to the point of John 1:29. All through the Old Testament, the sacrificial system, designed by God to point forward to the cross, involved the innocent dying in place of the guilty. That is exactly what the Lord Jesus did for us. The sinless Son of God died to pay the penalty for our sins. (It’s right in the Bible text.) However there is no reference to sin or atonement in the song. That is tragic. But it is the kind of thing that’s replacing, “Man of Sorrows, what a name for the Son of God who came…” and “When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died…” and many more wonderful hymns loaded with Bible truth.

      Thank you so much for your comments. God bless.