Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. rhwoodman
    27 January 2013 @ 7:27 am

    Good morning, Robert! Thanks for a great, thoughtful post.

    As a church music leader in a Baptist church near a major American university, I experience the conflict between hymns and modern songs. To attract college young adults, I am expected to sing contemporary worship songs. Some of them out there are very good. Most of them are shallow. Our congregation is mostly above 50, and most members don’t listen to Christian music radio, so they don’t know the songs, which means that the number of people who sing with me are few. Still, I’m expected to use the music to attract our college young adults who do come.

    On the other hand, singing hymns by themselves do not necessarily enhance congregational worship. While I certainly get more singing, and more enthusiasm in the singing, from the older members when I pick hymns, it certainly seems to me that most of them are singing from rote memory, instead of being actively engaged in the hymns. This is most evident when I lead a 4-verse hymn and sing verses 1, 3, and 4, instead of the common Baptist tradition of singing verses 1, 2, and 4. Inevitably half or more of the congregation goes to verse 2, realizes they are on the wrong verse, and then moves to verse 3. To me, this indicates that the singing has not fully engaged the mind, that it is rote singing rather than singing from a mind and a heart engaged with God’s Holy Spirit.

    I also want to point out that there are contemporary hymnodists who are writing good hymns, not fluff. One such person is Stuart Townend. Although he is a bit too Calvinist for my Arminian sensibilities, he nonetheless writes deeply moving, thoughtful hymns that are popular among younger adults. Take a look at his hymns “Loved Before the Dawn of Time (Salvation’s Song)” and “From the Breaking of the Dawn (Every Promise)” (the former written with Andrew Small, and the latter written with Keith Getty). They are not shallow praise and worship choruses but are instead serious hymns. Townend and others also take our great old hymns and set them in contemporary musical settings that appeal to young people. I use these often. One very good example of that is “New Doxology” by Thomas Miller, using a rearranged version of Old Hundredth and Thomas Ken’s wonderful words of praise. Another example is “Amazing Grace (My Chains Are Gone)” used in the movie Amazing Grace. This arrangement by Louie Giglio and Chris Tomlin preserves the words, and much of the tune that we so know and love, but make it contemporary and appealing to younger people. I have used it on several occasions.

    All this is to point out, Robert, that there are people who take hymns seriously in the Christian Church and who are putting them together in ways that sound fresh and contemporary to appeal to young people who neither know nor particularly like the old traditional hymns. Music leaders have to work hard to find such hymns, and older church members need to let go of the idea that the words of the hymn must be sung in a particular musical setting, but God can be worshiped deeply and thoughtfully in hymns today, even contemporary hymns, if we will but try to do so.

    As always, Robert, thanks for such a wonderful discussion on hymns, and may the Lord bless you and yours.

    • rcottrill
      27 January 2013 @ 9:02 am

      Some thoughtful comments as usual. Thanks for engaging in the discussion. I can identify with a number of things you’ve said. Let me offer a few more observations.

      Part of my emphasis on our traditional hymnody (and the lack of discussion of contemporary songs) has to do with the purpose of the blog. The treasure of old hymns is being neglected in too many churches. I want to reawaken interest in the old hymns, and show their worth. But I do know there are some fine songs being written today. One of Stuart Townend’s that you don’t mention is the very moving:

      How deep the Father’s love for us,
      How vast beyond all measure.

      However, when I’ve been a guest preacher in churches that use a lot of contemporary songs, I’ve found the majority of them ride a similar simplistic rail, not saying much at all. I’m not sure whether this reflects the overall quality of the genre, or simply the poor choices of the “worship team.” Often these are made up of young people–with the well-intentioned purpose of involving the youth. But perhaps they need more pastoral supervision in choosing the songs, as well as in platform behaviour.

      I think the whole worship team concept that’s in vogue today needs a rethink. (Again, I can only speak from my own experience.) If we turn the worship of Almighty God in our churches over to those who are spiritually immature, and lacking in a deeper understanding of the Scriptures, we are dishonouring the God we serve. In my article Sacred Music in the Old Testament, I show something of the reverent care this ministry calls for.

      I chuckled over your “Baptist tradition of singing verses 1, 2 and 4.” (I didn’t know it was the Baptists who are to blame for that. :-)) We have a service leader in our church who seemed to be in that rut, but I’m trying to educate him out of it–with some success. I’ve also had the experience you refer to, when visiting other churches, of seeing most of the congregation standing silent during the singing of some contemporary songs, then joining in enthusiastically when one of the older hymns is introduced. Both of these problems can be ameliorated with some care.

      There are several solutions I don’t particularly favour. 1) Giving up, and simply catering to the majority. 2) Tinkering with the old hymns (words and tune) to give them a more contemporary feel. Too often this seems to involve gutting the hymn and omitting most of the stanzas, while adding a repeated refrain sometimes of dubious quality. 3) Splitting contemporary and traditional parts of the service in two, with different service leaders is bad too.

      This last deserves a bit more comment. Some young guitar people come up to the front and lead the choruses. Then, an older service leader and pianist/organist come up, later in the service, and lead a hymn or two. The guitar people will say, “We don’t know those songs.” And the piano people we say, “We don’t know those songs.” So…? Learn them! This kind of split simply exacerbates the gap (often generational) between members of the congregation. What’s needed is a weekly practice in which all the songs are chosen prayerfully, and studied by all who will be involved. (The pastor should help with this, as I believe the songs should relate to the theme of his message, when possible.)

      A couple more thoughts, and then I’m done with my long ramble. First, old is good. There’s a value in singing the older hymns pretty much as written (rather than getting rid of all those “thee’s” and “thou’s,” because “We don’t talk that way any more”). The church is not a modern, pop phenomenon; it is many centuries old. I think we get a bit of a sense of the connection when we sing Watts as Watts wrote. I realize this can be overdone, but that continuity with the past is important to establish and emphasize.

      Finally, regarding the congregation skipping verse 3, even when instructed otherwise, because “that’s what we always do, and the problem of singing by rote with little thought of the meaning–both of those can be dealt with by using more creativity on a consistent basis (see the article 30 Ideas for Promoting Hymn Singing.) Get the congregation out of its old rut and all will be more alert, watching and listening for what comes next. And introduce the hymns in a way that focuses attention on their meaning.

      It’s a small thing, but I rarely if ever announce what stanzas we’re going to sing when introducing a hymn. I do that during the hymn. For example, as the last note of verse 2 is being sung, I’ll simply say, “Verse 4.” With a bit of practice, and an alert accompanist, it can be done smoothly.

      If you have read all the way to here, I commend your patience. 🙂 God bless.