Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. Robert H. Woodman
    5 September 2011 @ 4:34 am

    Hi, Robert,

    I do love this hymn, though I don’t usually pick it for a song service until the fall of the year (which is fast approaching, as I’m sure you’ve noticed up in Canada ). It frequently humbles me, and sometimes amazes me, that our greatest and most beloved hymns in Christianity quite often flow out of great pain, great strife, and great turmoil. This hymn is such an example.

    It saddens me, in a way, though, that this hymn was written, because of the circumstances in which it was conceived. The Thirty Years War was a vicious, truly ugly war based almost entirely in politics but waged in the name of religion. The effects of that war persisted in Europe – especially Germany! – for hundreds of years thereafter, and it is, I think, one of the roots of modern Europe’s disaffection with religion generally and Christianity in particular.

    The issue of strife and turmoil as a basis for great hymns, though, leads me to another point and a question. The point is that current American culture (and I hear that Canada is in a similar condition) is jaded, bored, and ungrateful for the blessings that have been poured out on it. We have been relatively insulated from serious shock and dislocation until the last few years when the recession hit, and even now, the recession has not seriously disrupted life and culture across the board. The question is whether that jaded, bored, ungrateful attitude among all ages and generations of our culture, but among our youth especially, has led to the loss of prominence for hymnody and the rise of cacophonous pop entertainment in our churches as the musical medium for worship of our Lord.

    As always, I look forward to your response.

    Robert Woodman

    • rcottrill
      5 September 2011 @ 7:56 am

      The answer to your question is yes, absolutely. The relatively affluent, peaceful and healthy life we live in North America is a major factor in the abandonment of our traditional hymns. While we may sorrow and sympathize at the trying circumstances of individuals or whole nations, it’s at such times that many seek the Lord with new urgency, finding comfort and strength in Him. Out of such experiences, hymns with greater devotional and doctrinal depth have come. It’s the same with the book of Psalms. Many of them were demonstrably written in painful circumstances. And many where this is not immediately evident may have been as well.

      Long ago in my research I noticed a lack of recent hymns on heaven and the second coming. Ira Sankey, in his Sacred Songs and Solos, included about 150 of them! Part of the reason for that emphasis (I think) was the nearness of death in the nineteenth century and before–the days before the development of many powerful drugs, and new and amazing surgical techniques. Sankey himself was a veteran of the Civil War, where he saw so many–some mere boys–slaughtered. Death was a very present reality in those days.

      Whether we’d actually put it into words, I fear so many of us are infected with the philosophy of the rich fool: “Soul, you have many goods laid up for many years; take your ease, eat, drink, and be merry” (Lk. 12:19). Things like the terrorist attacks of 9-11, and the recession, have shaken our confidence a little. Perhaps it will result in some churches revisiting our traditional hymnody. However, I’m not optimistic. The problem is not only that the people in the pews are unfamiliar with these great songs, the leadership is too. Bible colleges, I believe, have failed the church in not teaching courses on Christian hymnody.

      There are other factors too, of course. The entertainment mindset of our culture has invaded the church. More than doing business with God, congregants want to have their ears tickled. And the “seeker sensitive” philosophy so prevalent today calls for the dumbing down of preaching, and cloning of the music of the world, in order to attract those with little or no interest in church. Well, they may come all right. But to what?

      Apologies for rambling on. Bottom line: I agree. 🙂