Skip to content

12 Comments

  1. Pei Ling
    15 September 2009 @ 8:33 am

    Robert, pray tell, if Walford was a blind preacher, how did he know his bible so well? Braille or maybe someone read to him the Bible diligently? Not sure if you knew.

    • Robert Cottrill
      15 September 2009 @ 9:30 am

      There are some questions about William Walford that so far remain unanswered. Even his identity is open to some debate, though I’ve given the long accepted view in my blog. A century ago, the great hymn historian John Julian attributed the hymn to Fanny Crosby, but we’re now certain that was incorrect. The stories of some of our hymn writers are very well known. In other cases, we must collect evidence where we can, and sometimes make an educated guess, when contradictory data comes to light.

      As to Walford learning the Scriptures, though blind, there are a number of possibilities. Perhaps he was not blind from birth, and memorized much of the Scriptures before going blind. Or he may have had someone read to him, learning that way. He clearly had a wonderful memory. Blind hymn writer Fanny Crosby did too. Braille was invented in the early 1800’s, and he may have learned to use that. Interesting question. Thanks!

      Robert

  2. Pei Ling
    15 September 2009 @ 8:33 am

    Robert, pray tell, if Walford was a blind preacher, how did he know his bible so well? Braille or maybe someone read to him the Bible diligently? Not sure if you knew.

    • Robert Cottrill
      15 September 2009 @ 9:30 am

      There are some questions about William Walford that so far remain unanswered. Even his identity is open to some debate, though I’ve given the long accepted view in my blog. A century ago, the great hymn historian John Julian attributed the hymn to Fanny Crosby, but we’re now certain that was incorrect. The stories of some of our hymn writers are very well known. In other cases, we must collect evidence where we can, and sometimes make an educated guess, when contradictory data comes to light.

      As to Walford learning the Scriptures, though blind, there are a number of possibilities. Perhaps he was not blind from birth, and memorized much of the Scriptures before going blind. Or he may have had someone read to him, learning that way. He clearly had a wonderful memory. Blind hymn writer Fanny Crosby did too. Braille was invented in the early 1800’s, and he may have learned to use that. Interesting question. Thanks!

      Robert

  3. Pei Ling
    15 September 2009 @ 10:03 am

    Ah, I see. Thanks for your quick reply. On another note, was at your bible study site reading your notes on Dispensations with interest, which I am currently doing for my personal study. I have ordered David Dunlap’s Glory of the Ages (www.bibleandlife.org) and trust it will be beneficial for my study, not sure if u’ve heard of him but he came to Malaysia last month and my assembly have been blessed by his ministry 🙂

    Thanks for your input and your site, hope you don’t mind me dropping by from time to time!

    • Robert Cottrill
      15 September 2009 @ 10:36 am

      No, I certainly don’t mind you dropping in to either my Web site, /Wordwise Bible Studies/, or my blog, /Wordwise Hymns/. Welcome any time!

      I haven’t read Dunlap’s book, but it sounds good. The classic work on the subject is Dr. Charles Ryrie’s /Dispensationalism/. It was first published in 1966, then revised and expanded in 1995. Excellent, and easy to understand. His book /The Basis of the Premillennial Faith/ is excellent as well. Another book I highly recommend is /There Really Is a Difference/, by Dr. Renald Showers. He gives a thorough comparison of Covenant and Dispensational theology. Both men are solidly biblical in their approach, and gracious in spirit.

      And a quick personal word. While I consider myself a strong dispensationalist, I have managed, over the years, to associate with Christians belonging to various groups that may differ with me. When we unite on our common bond in Christ, major on the fundamentals of the faith, and share our views graciously, there is usually a listening ear.

      God bless. Always good to hear from you.

      Robert

  4. Pei Ling
    15 September 2009 @ 10:03 am

    Ah, I see. Thanks for your quick reply. On another note, was at your bible study site reading your notes on Dispensations with interest, which I am currently doing for my personal study. I have ordered David Dunlap’s Glory of the Ages (www.bibleandlife.org) and trust it will be beneficial for my study, not sure if u’ve heard of him but he came to Malaysia last month and my assembly have been blessed by his ministry 🙂

    Thanks for your input and your site, hope you don’t mind me dropping by from time to time!

    • Robert Cottrill
      15 September 2009 @ 10:36 am

      No, I certainly don’t mind you dropping in to either my Web site, /Wordwise Bible Studies/, or my blog, /Wordwise Hymns/. Welcome any time!

      I haven’t read Dunlap’s book, but it sounds good. The classic work on the subject is Dr. Charles Ryrie’s /Dispensationalism/. It was first published in 1966, then revised and expanded in 1995. Excellent, and easy to understand. His book /The Basis of the Premillennial Faith/ is excellent as well. Another book I highly recommend is /There Really Is a Difference/, by Dr. Renald Showers. He gives a thorough comparison of Covenant and Dispensational theology. Both men are solidly biblical in their approach, and gracious in spirit.

      And a quick personal word. While I consider myself a strong dispensationalist, I have managed, over the years, to associate with Christians belonging to various groups that may differ with me. When we unite on our common bond in Christ, major on the fundamentals of the faith, and share our views graciously, there is usually a listening ear.

      God bless. Always good to hear from you.

      Robert

  5. Robert H. Woodman
    13 September 2010 @ 3:27 am

    I greatly admire “Sweet Hour of Prayer”. It is a lovely hymn both for its word and for its tune. I am also intrigued and humbled by the fact that so many of the great hymns were written by people who had suffered physically (i.e., had a disability such as blindness such as William Walford or Fanny Crosby), emotionally, or spiritually (e.g., Robert Robinson, Horatio Spafford, Louisa Stead, to name just a few). Out of great trouble, stress, and sorrow comes hymns that are so beautiful and so rich with meaning. I wonder: is some of the shallowness of today’s so-called “praise and worship music” (not to mention the shallowness of so much preaching) is due to a lack of suffering by Western (especially American) Christians?

    • rcottrill
      13 September 2010 @ 8:57 am

      Thanks for your comments. As to hymn writers who faced difficult trials, it certainly has to be more than a coincidence that they wrote hymns that have blessed millions. I wrote about this in my article Suffering Hymn Writers. I guess, in part at least, it’s like the pearl in the oyster. Something beautiful created out of painful irritations–by the grace of God, in this case.

      And there may be something in what you say about the relatively affluent lifestyle of North Americans being related to the often shallow conttemporary songs. I also think that is behind the fact that so few hymns today talk about heaven and the return of Christ. We’re doing pretty well here, so there’s less of a longing for our real home above.

      And if you’ll excuse a brief “commercial”… With the arrival of fall, we begin to think of the Christmas season up ahead. If you do not have a good book on the subject of our Christmas carols, I encourage you to take a look at mine, Discovering the Songs of Christmas. In it, I discuss the history and meaning of 63 carols and Christmas hymns. The book is available through Amazon. (Might make a great gift too!)

  6. Robert H. Woodman
    13 September 2010 @ 3:27 am

    I greatly admire “Sweet Hour of Prayer”. It is a lovely hymn both for its word and for its tune. I am also intrigued and humbled by the fact that so many of the great hymns were written by people who had suffered physically (i.e., had a disability such as blindness such as William Walford or Fanny Crosby), emotionally, or spiritually (e.g., Robert Robinson, Horatio Spafford, Louisa Stead, to name just a few). Out of great trouble, stress, and sorrow comes hymns that are so beautiful and so rich with meaning. I wonder: is some of the shallowness of today’s so-called “praise and worship music” (not to mention the shallowness of so much preaching) is due to a lack of suffering by Western (especially American) Christians?

    • rcottrill
      13 September 2010 @ 8:57 am

      Thanks for your comments. As to hymn writers who faced difficult trials, it certainly has to be more than a coincidence that they wrote hymns that have blessed millions. I wrote about this in my article Suffering Hymn Writers. I guess, in part at least, it’s like the pearl in the oyster. Something beautiful created out of painful irritations–by the grace of God, in this case.

      And there may be something in what you say about the relatively affluent lifestyle of North Americans being related to the often shallow conttemporary songs. I also think that is behind the fact that so few hymns today talk about heaven and the return of Christ. We’re doing pretty well here, so there’s less of a longing for our real home above.

      And if you’ll excuse a brief “commercial”… With the arrival of fall, we begin to think of the Christmas season up ahead. If you do not have a good book on the subject of our Christmas carols, I encourage you to take a look at mine, Discovering the Songs of Christmas. In it, I discuss the history and meaning of 63 carols and Christmas hymns. The book is available through Amazon. (Might make a great gift too!)