Skip to content

7 Comments

  1. readywriterpublications
    20 November 2010 @ 7:11 am

    Hello Robert,
    Yes I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments you express here. Of course, like you I am not aware of the full situation in the Weigle household,
    “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” (Genesis 2:24) comes to mind.
    Also, if it was a situation where his wife was unsaved… “For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt save thy husband? or how knowest thou, O man, whether thou shalt save thy wife?” (1Cor. 7v16) comes to mind. Whatever our partner’s spiritual standing – we can’t be much of a witness to them when we are constantly away.
    Thanks for the post – food for thought!

    • rcottrill
      20 November 2010 @ 8:57 am

      Appreciate it. It was a difficult post to write. I wanted to be fair to a man I did not know personally. But as a retired pastor with 40 years experience in ministry, I know the pressures that can be put on the family, and the tricky business of keeping priorities straight.

  2. Jon Gleason
    1 July 2013 @ 2:16 pm

    This is excellent. You don’t have to judge a man to say, “Wait a minute, how does what we’re being told here hold up to Scripture?” The qualifications for Biblical leadership require that a man’s leadership of his home be exemplary.

    We should be very slow to put on a pedestal one who had this kind of home disaster. It may be judging to say that he was wrong, when we don’t know all the facts. It is also judging, and potentially even more damaging, to put him on a pedestal and blame his wife.

    • rcottrill
      1 July 2013 @ 2:30 pm

      Thanks for your comments. Strangely, I never thought specifically of First Timothy 3:4-5 when writing the article. Perhaps because Weigle’s evangelistic work didn’t involve leadership in a local church. But I do agree that the principle applies. I tried not to condemn the man personally. God is his judge. But the questions are valid for us all.

      • Jon Gleason
        1 July 2013 @ 2:43 pm

        Yes, It doesn’t specifically speak of evangelists. But even if someone disagreed with us and said the qualifications don’t apply to evangelists, at the very least they tell us something of how our Lord views the importance of family responsibilities.

        I also thought of I Timothy 5:8 and the importance of a man caring for his own family. That passage obviously refers to financial provision, but surely applies to other needs as well. When you take a wife, you promise before the Lord to love her as Christ loved the church, and physical or even emotional abandonment is not part of that picture.

  3. russ hortman
    13 November 2013 @ 8:44 pm

    Very interesting. I am just now looking for information on why Dr. Weigle’s first wife left. More specifically, did the church’s involvement/non-involvement with her impact this decision? In other words, where was the church in all of this?

    • rcottrill
      13 November 2013 @ 11:23 pm

      Excellent point. A supporting community of God’s people might have made a radical difference. There are unanswered questions here. If you find out more, I’d appreciate you letting my readers know.