Skip to content

2 Comments

  1. rhwoodman
    18 March 2015 @ 4:33 am

    Hi, Robert,

    I like this hymn! Thanks for introducing me to it. I’ve listened to it with Simpson’s tune, Bolton’s tune, and Exaltation by Forrest. I agree that Exaltation is the better tune for this hymn, but the refrain seems out of place no matter whose tune is used. The words of the refrain are fine, but the change in meter from the stanza to the refrain gives the refrain a rushed and less reverential feel compared to the stanzas, in my opinion. Do you favor keeping the refrain or omitting it?

    Reply

    • rcottrill
      18 March 2015 @ 6:47 am

      Thanks for the comments. Yes, the refrain is a distinct change. But maybe there’s a reason. We suddenly move from a reverently ordered prayer, to the kind of desperate self-talk that sometimes happens to us. (e.g. “Lord, thank You for your great salvation. I want Sunday’s message to turn the hearts of the people toward You, in praise and gratitude….But, oh, I’m so weak and wayward! I can’t do it, apart from Your grace. Save me from myself!”) Perhaps a little more frantic or slightly frenetic pace is appropriate.

      We have the same thing, in reverse, in Psalm 13. David starts out with a desperate and anguished plea in vss. 1-4. Then, the word “but” introduces his trustful resignation, in vss. 5-6. I wonder if he didn’t change the melody and the pacing of the music at that point.

      But there are examples of where it definitely doesn’t work. I’m not a fan of the way Ralph Hudson added catchy refrains to some great hymns–to somehow pep them up, I suppose. Isaac Watts’s Alas! and Did My Saviour Bleed? has an emotional intensity and reverent awe throughout that is palpable. The mood is violated, time and again, by Hudson’s jolly rumpty-dum, rumpty-dum refrain. Yuck! Just an opinion. 🙂

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *